Tuesday, October 23, 2012
Shakespeare and Millay
Both the poem by Shakespeare and the poem by Millay, deal with love and time affecting it. Shakespeares however, seems to be talking about how elements such as time, do not affect or get in the way of true love. He further establishes his position on love by saying, "If this be error, and upon me prov'd, I never writ, nor no man ever lov'd." In other words, he is comparing undeniable truths such as him being a writer and man having been in love, with something he additionally feels to be an undeniable truth, to establish it as such. Millay's poem on the other hand, carries an entire sense of loss. For instance, throughout the poem she uses terms such as "where and why", "I have forgotten", "lonely", etc. In her poem she compares the seasons change to love and love lost. To illustrate, she speaks of a winter's "lonely tree" in contrast to the summer "that sang in me". So it is evident that these two poems speak of love however, Shakespeare's is more optimistic while Millay's describes a forlornness.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good observations! So based on these two poems, could we say that true does love exist? And is love finite?
ReplyDeleteI think based on these two poems, we can at least be certain that both acknowledge the existence of true love. Shakespeare clearly being a proponent of the idea and Millay having lost it would indicate that there was once a love that is being spoken of. Further, I don't believe the two poems prove love to be strictly finite or infinite considering both poems exemplify instances of both sides of the coin.
ReplyDelete